Literary Ales

Thoughts of a Reforming Pelagian

  • Home
  • Links
    • 0
      11 Feb 2011

      A New Bible Translation—Now More Conservative.

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost

      While in the hospital with my wife and new baby, I decided to do some light reading, Chick Lit; no, not what you're thinking of but the bizarre cartoons of Jack Chick. Don't ask me why, probably sleep deprivation; I had tried reading Augustine's Confessions but didn't think I was doing justice to it by being so tired. 

      Anyway, Jack Chick is apparently a KJV-onlyite, and in his KJV page he made a reference to the new Conservapedia Bible. I'd heard of Conservapedia before but never looked at it. So I found the pages on Conservapedia. The most egregious mistranslation I found (granted I was looking for it because I know the passage) was the rewording of Acts 2.44 from 'And all who believed were together and had all things in common.' to the risible, 'Everyone who believed was together and shared values, faith, and the truth.' The context clearly shows it to be possessions; read the verses following. 

      On the Colbert Report show the founder of Conservapedia commented that the bulk of Jesus' parables were about the free-market. After looking around on the site, I'm not sure if it is the view of actual conservatives or parodying conservative view. (Sometime the two are very close.) But after seeing the Colbert Report interview I think it is actual conservatives. 

      So go read the pages on the 'Conservative Bible'; there is so much self-evidently wrong there it's unprofitable to discuss it all. A few things, however, jumped out at me: first, wouldn't a 'conservative Bible' conserve what went before it, shouldn't it republish (or just make minor corrections) to the KJV or Geneva or Wyclif Bible? The translation claims to be a thought-for-thought translation making principle 4 intriguing as it concerns utilizing new conservative words. (See also footnote 4) God lisped to us in Hebrew and Greek but fully reveals himself in doubleplusgood americanconservativenewspeak. Well perhaps on the basis of Proverbs 26.4 I shouldn't spend more time on this.

      • views
      • Tweet
    • 0
      3 Apr 2010

      A Review of What is Providence?

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost
      Part of the Basics of the Reformed Faith Series, Derek Thomas starts the booklet What is Providence? with a definition of providence illustrating what it is what is not. From this point he shows us the doctrine in the Bible using the narratives of Ruth, Joseph, and Job. 

      Dr Thomas then explains how God’s sovereign providence has been variously interpreted through the ages. He delineates the classical (Augustinian-Calvinistic) view, the simple divine foreknowledge (Arminian) view, Molinism, and open theism. The classic view asserts that God foreordains everything that comes to pass both the good and evil. ‘God knows what will occur in the future because he has predetermined it.’ (p. 17) The simple divine foreknowledge view holds that God knows the future and therefore foreordains because of his knowledge. This allows for human freedom according to its proponents. Molinism, also known as the middle knowledge view, asserts that since God knows all possible worlds, he has chosen this world where people make the choices they do freely. Dr Thomas acknowledges that while both the Arminian and Molinist views have flaws (The Arminian view limits God’s freedom, and the Molinist view does not properly defend what it set out to defend: libertarian human freedom.) they both ‘share many of the beliefs of those who maintain a classical view of providence.’ (p. 21) However the fourth view, open theism, dispenses with omniscience (or drastically redefines it). Open theologians believe God does not know the future exhaustively but ‘everything about the future which it is logically possible to know’ (p. 21 quoting William Hasker in God, Time, and Knowledge). Derek Thomas quotes the open theist Gregory Boyd, ‘God must work with, and battle against other created beings. While none of these beings can ever match God’s own power, each has some degree of genuine influence within the cosmos.’ (p. 16) Derek Thomas makes clear that in order to uphold absolute human freedom, they destroy the traditional concept of God. Moreover, there is little reassurance to offer the suffering.

      Derek Thomas delves into the Biblical evidence for the classical view of providence, giving Scripture for God’s universal sovereignty, even as it extends to individuals and wicked events (Cf. the crucifixion of Jesus and Isaiah 45.6-7). God’s sovereignty not only ensures prophecy will come to past but ‘is a necessary corollary of the gospel. For the gospel to be “good news” there must be some certainty that there is victory — over sin, over death, over Satan.’ (p. 24) 

      Dr Thomas also addresses the question of human responsibility and that the providence of God should encourage us and not make us lax in our callings. 

      What is Providence? examines the question of ‘How do we maintain the goodness of God when it appears as though evil things happen not simply “under his watch,” but according to his plan!’ (p. 25) The author recognizes we live in a broken world and no one saving Christ is truly innocent, but the Scriptures point us to examples such as Job and the man born blind to show there is a deeper answer. Jesus answers the question of the disciples concerning the man born blind by replying, ‘It was not this man sinned, or his parents, but that the works of God might be displayed in him.’ (John 9.3) These accounts show us the hand of God, that we are not merely subject to chance or fortune, or even our own ability to make good choices but that God works his purposes to his own end.

      This, of course, is more scary, that God would allow sin and suffering for his own purpose. Unless we realize the person of the Creator and Providence is also our Redeemer. ‘The cross dispels any doubt as to the outcome, for there — in the darkest point of human history — sin and evil were conquered and Satan vanished.’ (p. 36) God’s purpose is to redeem himself a people, to establish his kingdom, and to give us more than what we lost in Adam: to bring us into a better estate and secure us in righteousness; all this he does to his own glory! 
      • views
      • Tweet
    • 2
      30 Oct 2008

      Reflexions on a Journey

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost
      This past weekend I finished reading John Calvin’s Institutes of Christian Religion. Five or six years ago I began reading while at the University. It is as if a journey has drawn to a close. As my reader no doubt knows, the Institutes are Calvin’s systematic theology. Better histories have been written of the work so I won’t bore my reader here. Likewise I will not attempt to write a full review of Calvin's magnum opus. When I reflect on the work, I am amazed by the depth of John Calvin and his knowledge of the Word and the Church Fathers. Calvin packs much information into his paragraphs; frequently one has to reread him a few times to grasp what he is saying. It also helps to read him with a dictionary in hand, but where else would one learn the words ‘concupiscence’ and ‘anagogic’ and more than score of other words? The sovereignty of God features prominently in this book. Calvin’s writing is saturated with this. Not only did God sovereignly work creation, but he sovereignly works redemption. Salvation is all of God, our faith (given to us by God) receives his gift of grace. Some of the many excellent passages include the beginning where Calvin asserts that true knowledge of self leads to true knowledge of God leads to true knowledge of self. The more we see our own sin, it causes us to look outside ourselves for the remedy, and the more that we look to Christ and his grace, the more it causes us to be aware of our evil. Calvin also has great sections on how we receive grace from Christ and the great benefits of justification and adoption. Truly God has lavished his riches upon us in Christ. A wonderful read, Calvin was a student of the Word and marvelled at the depth of the grace of God. May we take this spirit into our own time and enjoy the work of a sovereign God!
      • views
      • Tweet
    • 0
      7 Aug 2008

      Bespectacled

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost

      Media_httpcthallwordp_vdhci

      Just as old or bleary-eyed men and those with weak vision, if you thrust before them a most beautiful volume, even if they recognize it to be some sort of writing, yet can scarcely construe two words, but with the aid of spectacles will begin to read distinctly; so Scripture, gathering up the otherwise confused knowledge of God in our minds, having dispersed our dullness, clearly shows us the true God. —Institutes of Christian Religion: (I. vi. 1): John Calvin
      • views
      • Tweet
    • Search

    • My Other Blogs

      • The Halls of Tucson
      • Reformed Confessions Serialized
    • Blogroll

      • Cavman Considers
      • reformation 21
    • Websites

      • ESV Online
      • BoardGameGeek
      • Reformed Forum
      • Wikipedia
      • Westminster Bookstore
    • Books

      • Biblical Theology — Geerhardus Vos
      • Reformed Dogmatics — Herman Bavinck
      • Institutes of the Christian Religion — John Calvin
      • Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell — Susanna Clarke
      • Planet Narnia — Michael Ward
      • The Lord of the Rings — J.R.R. Tolkien
      • Reformation Study Bible (ESV)
      • Word of God in English: Criteria for Excellence in Bible Translation — Leland Ryken
      • The Valley of Vision — Arthur G. Bennett
    • Children's Books

      • The Jesus Storybook Bible: Every Story Whispers His Name — Sally Lloyd-Jones
      • The Big Picture Story Bible — David Helm
    • Tags

      • John Calvin
      • Basics of the Reformed Faith
      • Carl Trueman
      • Augustine
      • Bible
      • Confessions
      • baptism
      • covenant
      • grace
      • photography
      • Martin Luther
      • Trinity
      • Tucson
      • justification
      • 16th century
      • Carcassonne
      • Christmas
      • God
      • Institutes of Christian Religion
      • Jesus
      • Philip Graham Ryken
      • Reformed
      • Thomas
      • Tolkien
      • beer
      • creation
      • evangelicalism
      • history
      • worldview
      • zeal
      • Eucharist
      • Lord’s Supper
      • Michael Ward
      • transubstantiation
      • Books
      • Bryan Chapell
      • C. S. Lewis
      • Christian Doctrine
      • Chronicles of Narnia
      • Church
      • Covenant Theology
      • Derek Thomas
      • Dispensationalism
      • Eschatology
      • Family
      • German-style Board Game
      • Glenn Beck
      • Graeme Goldsworthy
      • Heinrich Bullinger
      • Herman Bavinck
      • Incarnation
      • Israel
      • Jaroslav Pelikan
      • Jesus Seminar
      • Johann Tetzel
      • John
      • Kim Riddlebarger
      • Lord of the Rings
      • Luke
      • Macintosh
      • Mark
      • Matthew
      • Nativity
      • Pixar
      • Planet Earth
      • Robert Funk
      • Roy Hoover
      • Scotland
      • Stephen Smallman
      • Ten Commandments
      • The Five Gospels
      • Wages of Spin
      • Westminster Confession of Faith
      • abortion
      • amillennialism
      • atheism
      • backyard
      • church history
      • covenant children
      • death
      • environmentalism
      • faith
      • film review
      • hope
      • humour
      • iMac
      • infant baptism
      • joy
      • knowledge
      • organic
      • paedobaptism
      • piety
      • politics
      • preaching
      • providence
      • quotes
      • racism
      • redemption
      • sacrament
    • Archive

      • 2012 (5)
        • May (3)
        • January (2)
      • 2011 (47)
        • December (1)
        • November (1)
        • October (2)
        • September (3)
        • August (2)
        • June (2)
        • May (12)
        • April (10)
        • March (7)
        • February (4)
        • January (3)
      • 2010 (47)
        • December (4)
        • November (3)
        • September (3)
        • August (3)
        • July (5)
        • June (5)
        • May (5)
        • April (7)
        • March (6)
        • February (2)
        • January (4)
      • 2009 (27)
        • December (1)
        • November (2)
        • October (4)
        • September (3)
        • August (3)
        • July (3)
        • June (1)
        • April (3)
        • March (2)
        • February (2)
        • January (3)
      • 2008 (53)
        • December (6)
        • November (8)
        • October (4)
        • September (2)
        • August (5)
        • July (2)
        • June (2)
        • May (3)
        • April (3)
        • March (5)
        • February (7)
        • January (6)
      • 2007 (18)
        • December (7)
        • November (11)
    • Obox Design
  • Literary Ales

    A twenty-something confessional Presbyterian writing from Tucson, Az.

    14184 Views
  • Get Updates

    Subscribe via RSS
    TwitterFacebookTumblr